https://wiki.bootstrapaustin.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=66.69.239.137 2026-04-07T13:33:43Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.30.0 https://wiki.bootstrapaustin.org/index.php?title=Talk:Boot_Board_(Austin)&diff=1696 2006-04-27T12:48:13Z

<p>66.69.239.137: </p> <hr /> <div>I've been finding it interesting that I seem to be the only person involved with the Boot Boards who thinks that Bijoy's MRE framework may be a useful way to think about the composition of the boards.<br /> <br /> I'd love to know where everybody else fits in MRE and where they see their businesses fitting in MRE.<br /> <br /> I, for example, have a Maven core with a strong secondary Relater component. I think for my business to succeed it needs to be a Relater company with a Maven infracturure. As such, I'd love a board which is heavy on Relaters so they can help me hold back my Maven tendencies as I guide my business in a Relater direction.<br /> <br /> My previous business partner was a Maven/Evangelist and I strongly feel that his Evangelist tendencies pulled us in a wrong direction.<br /> <br /> Any comments?<br /> <br /> -- Chris Garrigues<br /> <br /> == BootBoard for Growth, ==<br /> <br /> Here are the people that I know are interested in a Growth Boot Board:<br /> <br /> David Swedlow (leader),<br /> Ryan Pitylak (me),<br /> Mikey Trafton,<br /> Jason Myers,<br /> Jeff Hotz,<br /> Chad Jewell,<br /> Anthony Chen,<br /> Cruce Saunders,<br /> Dustin Wells,<br /> Patti Hill<br /> <br /> This is a big group to have on one board, or is it? Maybe it's perfect?</div>

66.69.239.137